Chaucers Canterbury Tales - The Language of Chaucer Essay -- Canterbu

The wrangle of Chaucer in The Canterbury Tales With careful study, the wording of Chaucer in The Canterbury Tales is usually clarified and locomoteless as the beautiful verse narrative it is. There is, however, the common worry that comes when one is unable to comprehend it in affectionateness English becoming to coherently study it. The question has been raised as to whether it might be more useful to study a translated version of the poem so that it rotter be understood on first reading. The main worry with this idea is that in nearly every translation, the great beauty of the language is lost in translation, thus subtracting a great deal of the poems world-beater and charm. Some point out, however, is required to make it accessible for the average reader. Therefore, the best resolving is moderation between translation and language which captures the beauty in a manageable form. Such a form is presented in The Norton Anthology of English Literature, from which can b e pulled the following four lines Whan that April with his showres soote The droughte of March hath perced to the roote, And bathed every veine in swich licour, Of which vertu engendred is the flowr (ll. 1-4) The above is a mix of the veritable spelling with some gloss (in side nones) and spelling translations meant to aide in reading, but not transfigure the poem completely. With relatively little study in the pronunciation of Middle English, most readers could understand and read aloud the poem with its intended lyricism. afterwards some getting used to, it reads almost smoothly, and with concentration is certainly coherent. In the original manuscript, the reading is difficult enough that coherency is less feasible. The original spe... ... pick up the themes, true, but in reality they are all half of the Chaucer experience. While there are a variety of late translations which completely reorient The Canterbury Tales for todays readers, most fall short in expressing the weighty control that Chaucer had over his native language. Changes can be made to his textbook if we want to understand it, but the best of these modifications interferes little or not at all with the authentic reading this way the rich sound of the original is maintained and upheld. Bibliography Brewer, Derek. Tradition and Innovation in Chaucer. London Macmillan, 1982. Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Canterbury Tales. Pp. 3-328. In the Riverside Chaucer. Larry D. Benson, ed. Boston Houghton, 1987. Delasanta, Rodney. Language and The Canterbury Tales. Chaucer Review 31.3 (1997), 209-231.