'Personality in Politics: Analyzing George W. Bush Essay\r'

'The affinity between genius, experience, and g everyplacenmental decision-making has been established in several studies. This has been undertaken using â€Å"at a di side techniques” which evaluate the relationship using biographies, speeches, and text from interviews. One of the most self-aggrandizing names that focused on the predictive top executive of record on political styles and actions of universe draws has been renowned political scientists Marg argont Hermann. Hermann lists six factors that influence the impact of populace attractions on strange insurance.\r\nâ€Å"1) what their world view is; 2) what their political style is the like; 3) what motivates them to nurture the position they do; 4) whether they are interested in and have knowledge in contrary affairs; 5) what the conflicting policy climate was like when the leader was starting out his or her political career; and 6) how the leader was socialized into his or her present position. † Essenti wholey, personality, background, and previous experiences shape the distant policy-making behavior of world leaders.\r\nThis becomes curiously clear when leaders confront a national crisis. How a leader conducts unknown affairs in the midst of crisis heightens his aim of control on decision-making and resources. It is during this time that the interplay of personality and experience can be evaluated on their impact on the leader’s words and actions. disposition is a square modifier in a leader’s foreign policy-making behavior. This was posited by Hermann in her leadership analysis of 51 world leaders. Hermann (2003) defined personality to be a mixture of seven characters.\r\nThese were â€Å"`1) public opinion in ability to control events, 2) abstract daedality, 3) need for power, 4) distrust of others, 5) in-group bias, 6) self-confidence, and 7) task orientation. ” This story applies this mode of analysis on George W. crotch hair, the fo rty-third President of the United States with an emphasis on his behavior during the phratry 11 Crisis and the Iraq War. bush displayed last feeling in his ability to control events, a personality trait related to how an individual perceives his control over political circumstances and his perception on the influence or significance of his order in resolving a foreign policy issue.\r\nJudging on his pronouncements active the righteousness of the Iraq War and the responsibility of the US and its allies to stop Saddam Hussein, shrub was strong, even arrogant in his tactile sensation that the US must wage war, even going against the judgment of the United Nations shelter Council, â€Å"America will never want a permission slip to view as the security of our people. ” In terms of his abstract complexity, pubic hair was more inclined to recover foreign affairs in scandalous and white terms than appreciate it to be the result of a myriad of factors.\r\nBush displays a straightforward binary stance on the positioning of countries in foreign affairs, most notably the classification that all US action is good and countries remediate fol number one it. In his speech herald to the US campaign after September 11, Bush said, â€Å"Every nation in every region now has a decision to make: Either you are with us or you are with the terrorists. ” In analyzing the causes of foreign policy problems, Bush went for the trivial explanation in place of the complex one.\r\nIn terms of self-confidence, Bush displays high levels of optimism and fervor despite being primed(p) in tight situations. His well-known Bushisms, for instance, seemed to have not marred his confidence or his nature. Despite his numerous verbal fiascos such(prenominal) as in addressing families of victims of September 11, â€Å"They misunderestimated the commiseration of our country… I talk to families who die,” Bush has managed to even make fun of himself. In sum, the foreign policy decisions of George W.\r\nBush were musing of his personality that is characterized by high belief in ability to control events, low conceptual complexity, and high degree of self-confidence. His personality and background created a foreign policy legacy which became detrimental to his party’s bid for the 2010 presidential seat. Bibliography CNN. â€Å"State of the mating Address,” (2004) http://edition. cnn. com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/01/20/sotu. transcript. 1/index. html (accessed whitethorn 8, 2010). CNN. â€Å"Transcript of President Bush’s address. ” (2001) http://edition. cnn.\r\ncom/2001/US/09/20/gen. bush. transcript/ (accessed whitethorn 8, 2010). Feller, Ben, â€Å"Analysis: Bush’s Personality Shapes His Legacy. ” MSNBC (Jan. 3, 2009), http://www. msnbc. msn. com/id/28482517/ (accessed May 8, 2010). Hermann, Margaret, â€Å"Explaining Foreign Policy bearing Using the Personal Characteristics of Political Leaders. † planetary Studies Quarterly (1983) 24:7-46. Hermann, Margaret, â€Å"Assessing Leadership stylus: Trait Analysis,” in The Psychological assessment of Political Leaders, ed. J. M. Post (Ann Arbor: University of bread Press, 2003).\r\n'