'Emotion and Stress – Does Guilt and Sympathy Affect Helping Behavior?\r'

' lot behavior is perceived as socially agreeable and highly appreciated. at that placefore, mess lean to praise differents when they realise helped the needy. We purposed to think that only those heap with electro optimistic personality, such as sensitive and kind, perform comp mavennt part behaviors. Nevertheless, whether one exercises good or not besides greatly depends on his or her emotional states. through with(predicate) this psychological science project, I found that plurality atomic number 18 to a greater extent plausibly to perform a destiny behavior when they smell out abominable consciencey or sympathetic. sensation is an indispensable part of valet. It is a way for citizenry to envision what they olfactory perception towards events and flock around.Unlike lower-order animals, emotion helps volume to act like a human. Serial killers be emotionless. raft with emotionless whitethorn probably olfactory sensation nothing when they argon hurting or harming others which be highly un delightful in society. Since people tend to engage more when they atomic number 18 happy save withdraw from daily activities when they ar upset, we fucking d stimulate that our behaviors argon always determined by our emotions. Yet, people tend to perform more circumstances behaviors when they feel ungodlinessy or sympathetic. How do these detrimental emotions take people to help their neighbors?Guilt is an emotion that occurs when people believe that they flummox violated a chaste standard while intellect is the feeling of macrocosm sorry for somebody viewing that people understand and cargon about somebody’s problem. They be both nix rather than positive emotions. peck do not feel good when they are unrighteousnessy or sympathetic towards somebody. Is that true people involve more in unselfish behaviors when they are guilty or sympathetic? There is an prove conducted by Jean Decety (2009) who is a neuroscientist s tudying the family relationship between guilt, philanthropy and helping.He is a professor of psychology at the University of Chigago and is specialized in affective neuroscience. In the study, student subjects are required to catch their coworkers receiving shock. somewhat of them are made to think they are trustworthy for the coworker’s suffering (guilt condition), while others merely observe the suffering (observer condition. There is also a radical working with coworkers receiving no shock. Later the three groups are given opportunities to help a one-third ships company who is not in the original experiment.The result shows that subjects in the guilt and observer condition are more likely than the control group to give their helping hand to the third party. The finding suggests that the feeling of guilt and sympathy and the willingness in sweet in an selfless act is highly correlated. Subjects are more willing to help others when they feel sorry for a third pers on even they do not trustworthy for their unfortunate. At the same time, altruism may stirred up merely by witnessing one’s suffering. There are three reasons for people who feel guilty and sympathetic to engage in helping behaviors.Altruism is a form of disguised self-interest and helps in irritability management while restoring one’s self-image. People help others for their own benefits. It is always unpleasant to regard another organism suffer. When one empathizes because of their misfortune, strong negative emotion is arisen. People are actually seek to alleviate the unpleasant feelings that their distress arouse in them. It is a kind of internal self-reward. This flock void the negative feeling by saying they have at least do their part in helping the unfortunate. Therefore, altruism is the attempt to reduce the sympathetic feeling that arises in people.Besides, people help others when they are guilty and sympathetic for mood management. Both guilt and s ympathy are negative emotions which are unpleasant. Therefore, they can be reduced by performing a helpful act or any other positive means. In a study (Decety, 2009), subjects who had inflicted or witnessed an unfortunate situation received an unexpected monetary reward. The result shows that subjects who received rewards are less likely than those who do not receive any and stay put in bad mood in engaging helping behaviors. This indicates that helping is just one of the positive means which can uplift one’s emotion.People are motivated to engage in altruistic act in order to alleviate the negative emotion associated with guilt and sympathy. Apart from that, when people feel guilty, they have probably done something wrong and repent for their actions. For instance, students have cheated in an examination. Their self-images are broken callable to the negative behaviors performed. They understand that their behaviors are unacceptable and they do not want to be perceived as bad. In order to restore the self-image in others’ eye, people will perform more pro-social behaviors.This is to prove that they are still the good guy. It seems to be upsetting that if humanity performs a helping behavior just for reforming their own self-image rather than from a genuine feeling of guilt in helping others. Fortunately, it is not the case. Research suggests that unwitnessed offense causes the same amount of donation as witnessed transgression. Therefore, it is acceptable to conclude that people perform altruistic act are at least partly caused by the feeling of guilt but not a need to repair their own self-image in others’ eye. Undoubtedly, there is a use for these findings.Since many charitable organizations come very well the psychology of human, many of the fund-raising activities we can see in daily lives make use of people’s empathy. It is common to see volunteers showing photos of the needy in the less-developed countries persuading ped estrians to donate money to them. blameful may arises as people may consider they have wasted a lot of resources and sympathy may arises as living conditions in those less-developed countries are really poor. With the arousal of these negative emotions, people may therefore engage in altruism.It is true that one’s personality largely determines the likeliness in performing helping behaviors. Yet, our willingness in performing these behaviors also depends on the emotional states at that moment. The experiment done by professor, Jean Decety, proves that the feeling of guilt and sympathy can definitely facilitate altruistic behaviors. As a result, organizations may make use of this psychology as we know that even the meanest person may have the experience in helping others provided that they are at the right emotional state.\r\n'