Peter principle Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Peter principle - Research Paper Exampleo the skills required for a specific position of employment, and this idea was not taken into account in the purportedly common sense beliefs of traditional promotions.While the idea was first proposed with a humorous edge, the true implications of the theory were not that funny. The Peter Principle may expose an inherent flaw in the hierarchical promotion organization that is used by many companies.Promotions may come from within a company that kneads in an employment hierarchy. When this is the case, we may be tempted to believe that a person has been promoted because they are the best fitting candidate for the tasks associated with the position. However, it is plainly as likely that the promoted employee was selected for overall competence, rather than for any position-specific qualities. The lack of the required skill-set, as related to a position recently obtained through promotion, to perform a prank effectively will consistently pi ss results that highlight the promoted candidates newfound incompetence. However, according to Dr. Peter, these employees would not face a risk of job termination unless they were so incompetent that it basically defines their being. Any level of incompetence below this line would scarcely fit in with other instances of promotions that are not based on specific skill sets, divergence us with a business that is defined by mediocrity.The Peter Principle has brought concern to many organizations that operate in a hierarchical manner, and as a result there have been studies developed with the endeavor of counteracting this effect. A 2010 study (Pluchino, Rapisarda, and Garofalo 467) discusses the principle and how its accuracy would indicate a high level of company-wide inefficiency taking tail in many organizations. The researchers used a complicated computational model to test the efficiency of some(prenominal) promotional strategies that could be employed within a companys hiera rchy by their unsusceptibility to the Peter Principle. The results showed